March is my favourite month. Firstly, it’s my birthday month, which makes me an Aries, which as everyone knows is the best sign to fall under. Secondly, three months into the year is long enough to look back and pat yourself on the back (or gasp) in the knowledge that there is still plenty of time to keep up the good work or to try make things better.
It has been a good quarter for IFS. We have had some amazing clients, including a Scottish whisky distillery, a designer shoe-making business and an oil drilling company. We have also been working with entrepreneurs, delivering cutting edge technology, such as real time power tracking devices and artificial intelligence. Now, if your electric socket starts talking back you know who to blame. We have also had the usual mix of wealthy entrepreneurs, looking to make the UK or Cyprus or Spain (or even Italy and Portugal) their new home and requiring the usual pre-arrival tax planning — residence, trusts, personal trading and investment companies, estate taxes, property, etc.
Many of you must know about the International Business Structuring Association (IBSA), which we founded back in 2014. It has grown steadily, which would be impossible without its members’ contributions and especially amazing local committees — in the established branches such as the US, Europe and South-East Asia and the up and coming ones in Cyprus and the Middle East.
I have been the vice-president of the Association since the end of last year — thank you Roy for taking a leap of faith in me — and I have enjoyed my role tremendously. Not only have I had the chance to liaise with some of the world’s best professionals in the area of tax and business planning, but also in the last few months I have travelled to Cyprus, Switzerland and Dubai where I met the people behind IBSA’s domestic branches and have also furthered IFS’ business.
I look forward towards the rest of the year with guarded optimism — guarded because like most of my compatriots I suffer from a light form of cherophobia (fear of jinxing things, in case you didn’t know). I am speaking at a few high-profile events, including at the English Law Day forum in Kyiv, a tax and immigration conference in London, possibly at the Russian Legal Forum in Saint-Petersburg and at various IBSA events in Dubai and the rest of the world. I am also very proud to be delivering the ‘Polycon’ international tax planning course on 24 June 2017, which will be hosted by IBSA member Squire Patton Boggs at their London office. It is the new iteration of the programme that Roy and I have delivered at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (part of the University of London) for several years and which we took to Russia and Cyprus. You will receive separate invitations from me. And finally, I look forward to helping entrepreneurial clients solve their tax and business problems, essentially continuing with what IFS has been doing for the past 45 years.
Many readers have heard about sweeping changes to the UK’s tax regime, particularly in the areas of personal and residential property taxation. This month’s article talks about the key amendments that you should be aware of and it is based on the analysis prepared by IBSA member Simmons Gainsford LLP.
Enjoy the spring and speak to you in April.
With kind regards
DMITRY ZAPOL
Developments in UK Property Taxation
By Bas Kundu, Simmons Gainsford LLP
There have been some very significant changes to the taxation of real estate which have recently come into effect or are about to come into effect. This note sets out a summary of a number of these key changes, which need to be considered when undertaking UK property transactions.
1. Residential property issues
1.1 Higher stamp duty land tax (SDLT) rates
From 1 April 2016, an additional 3% SDLT charge applies where an individual, joint purchaser, or company purchases an additional residential property costing over £40,000. Spouses or civil partners are treated as joint purchasers even if the additional property is bought individually. The charge applies regardless of the location of the existing property and it frequently comes as a surprise to families moving to the UK from abroad. It is thought that with the expansion of the information exchange agreements network, introduction of the Common Reporting Standard and strengthening penalties for offshore non-compliance HMRC will have an array of tools to enforce the charge.
The additional charge won’t apply if an individual is replacing his main residence regardless of its location. If the purchase occurs prior to the sale, then the additional charge is payable, however a refund can then be claimed if the first property is sold within 36 months of the acquisition of the replacement.
The rules are complex, and there are various traps for the unwary. In particular, companies acquiring property are within the scope of the charge even if no other residential properties are owned, as are trusts unless a beneficiary has a life interest in the property and doesn’t own other residential property personally. There is no exemption from the 3% surcharge for institutional investors, although “multiple dwellings relief” is still available to reduce the applicable SDLT rate, and the purchase of six or more units in a single transaction can still benefit from the (lower) SDLT commercial property rates.
1.2 Inheritance tax on UK residential property
In the past, UK property held in a company incorporated outside the UK (possibly held in a non-UK resident trust) was not a UK asset for IHT purposes and therefore, for non-UK domiciled individuals (“non-doms”), not subject to IHT.
From 6 April 2017 Inheritance Tax (IHT) will be chargeable on all UK residential property, regardless of ownership structure. These new IHT rules affect all non-doms whether they are resident in the UK or not. Anyone who currently owns UK residential property through a company incorporated outside the UK or other opaque vehicle will be liable to IHT on the value of such UK property in the same way as UK domiciled individuals. The measure will apply to all UK residential property whether it is occupied or let and of whatever value.
Debts taken out to acquire such property will reduce the value subject to IHT. However, such debts will themselves be considered to be UK assets for IHT purposes rendering the lender liable for IHT on the value of the debt.
Because in most cases the new rules are making obsolete the use of companies and trusts to hold UK residential property, clients should consider de-enveloping strategies. Unfortunately, these come with their own tax pitfalls and prior advice should be sought.
1.3 ATED
The ‘Annual tax on enveloped dwellings’ or “ATED” was introduced in 2013. It is a form of tax designed to discourage individuals from acquiring and holding high value residential property in the UK through corporate vehicles, which is otherwise known as ‘enveloping’. Such companies were often used as a means of mitigating SDLT charges and / or IHT.
ATED is a single annual payment charged for each period of 12 months, beginning on the 1st April and ending on the 31 March the following year.
The threshold for this charge was initially set at £2m, based on the property value at 1 April 2012 (or date of acquisition if later). However, from 1 April 2016, the threshold has been reduced to £500,000. Properties will need to be revalued every five years and so for properties owned on 1 April 2012 the next valuation date is set for 1 April 2017. There are a number of reliefs available to eliminate the ATED charge, however please note that there will still be an ATED notification requirement. The reliefs include, in particular, where a property is held for the purposes of a property rental business or as trading stock. It should be noted that the ATED regime applies to all companies and not just non-UK corporates.
In the last years, we have seen many clients who had been unaware of their ATED liability and suffered penalties and interest, particularly where the property-owning company was managed by an independent services provider. It is in their best interest to check whether the company has complied with its ATED obligations.
1.4 Non-resident capital gains
Capital gains tax (CGT) applies to non-residents disposing of UK residential property, with some exceptions, on gains arising on disposals after 5 April 2015.
The CGT charge applies to gains realised by non-resident individuals who hold UK residential property directly or via a partnership, non-UK resident trusts and non-resident companies. The charge applies to rental properties as well as those ‘owner-occupied’, in other words, even if the property was let, its disposal will still lead to taxation if there are gains.
The charge will not apply to a ‘diversely-held’ company or a widely-marketed OEIC or unit trust. A ‘diversely-held’ company is one that is (broadly) not controlled by 5 or fewer shareholders and their associates.
Non-resident companies will be subject to CGT at 20%, on the gains affected, net of an adjustment for inflation. For individuals, the CGT charge is at 18% for basic rate taxpayers and at 28% for higher and additional rate taxpayers. The applicable rate will be determined by reference to the non-UK resident individual’s UK income levels for the relevant tax year. They may be entitled to the CGT annual exemption.
Disposals are to be reported within 30 days of completion of the disposal. Except where a UK self-assessment tax return is already required, the tax is also payable within 30 days of completion. This is an important deadline, particularly considering that a non-UK resident seller may not realise that they have to start liaise with HMRC.
Where ordinary self-assessment returns are being filed, the tax will be payable according to the usual timing for self-assessment. Therefore, individuals and trustees already paying tax under the self-assessment system, the tax will be due by 31 January next following the tax year in which disposal occurs (which would generally be on exchange of contracts).
1.5 Property repairs and renewals
From 6 April 2016 the wear and tear allowance for furnished properties and the statutory renewals basis for furnished or unfurnished properties no longer apply, being replaced by the Replacement of Domestic Items rules.
“Domestic items” include furniture, household appliances and kitchenware which are not revenue in nature and so, without these rules, a landlord would obtain no relief on this expenditure. Fixtures (fixed plant and machinery) and central heating systems are not domestic items, but may obtain relief if they are being repaired.
The level of deduction available is the cost of a like-for-like replacement. Any cost for an improvement, or any sales proceeds must be taken off the allowable cost.
1.6 Individual landlords – finance cost restrictions
From 6 April 2017, landlords will not be able to deduct all their finance costs (most importantly mortgage interest and fees) from their property income. Instead they will receive a credit equal to 20% of their finance costs. This may affect buyers of high-value properties where the mortgage interest would have significantly reduced the taxable amount under the old rules.
This restriction is being phased in over 4 years, with 75% of finance costs allowed as a deduction in 2017/18, reducing to 0% by 2020/21. Further restrictions will apply if total property income or total non-savings taxable income is lower than the finance costs incurred.
The new rules don’t apply to companies so it may be more attractive for landlords to own properties within a company structure with the additional benefit of lower corporation tax rates, but additional rate SDLT will need to be borne in mind for new purchases with either form of property holding.
2. Property Companies and Groups – corporation tax
2.1 Finance cost restrictions
From 1 April 2017, larger UK-based property groups will suffer restrictions on the tax relief they can claim in respect of their loan finance. Under the new rules the corporation tax deduction UK companies can claim for finance costs will be capped at the higher of £2m and 30 per cent of their adjusted UK EBITDA (in some cases the cap will be higher, where a group’s third party finance costs are higher as a proportion to the worldwide group’s EBITDA). There will be an exemption from the new rules for some commercial landlords. In response to extensive lobbying from the real estate industry, the Government indicated its intention to extend the exemption for “public benefit infrastructure” activities to some commercial letting. The details of this exemption is yet to be announced.
2.2 Losses
New rules on tax losses also come into effect on 1 April 2017. The rules will restrict the amount of losses which can be utilised. In effect, companies with annual profits in excess of £5m will only be able to use losses from earlier periods to shelter 50 per cent of the excess.
3. UK property developers
The cap on the use of carried forward losses will particularly impact on developers who typically incur losses in the early years of a project and realise a significant profit on practical completion. In response to concerns that the new rules could lead to developers being taxed on more than their economic profit, the Government have provided the ability for developers to carry back unused losses over the final three years of trading. However, this will not always assist particularly where a development trade continues for more than three years after practical completion, due to the time it takes to sell all the completed units.
New rules have also been introduced which extend the scope of UK tax on the profits of developing UK land. Previously it was possible to use offshore structures to shelter development profits from UK tax. Under the new rules, which took effect for disposals of land on and after 5 July 2016, the scope of corporation tax has been extended so that in broad terms all profits of UK development will be taxed regardless of where the developer is based and how they have structured the development. The UK’s double tax treaties with Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man have also been amended to ensure that developers cannot use vehicles based in these jurisdictions to escape UK tax.
HMRC in their guidance have stressed that the new rules will not be applied to genuine investment transactions.
4. Other international issues
4.1 Extension of corporation tax: – non-resident landlords
The Government is consulting on extending the scope of corporation tax to non-UK resident companies which receive taxable income from the UK, such as rental income from UK land. This change will affect the large number of investors who hold their UK real estate assets offshore.
The stated desire here is to “deliver equal tax treatment” of UK resident and non-resident vehicles. On the plus side, it will reduce the headline rate of tax for offshore landlords’ rental income in line with the UK corporation tax rate (which will reduce to 19 per cent for the financial year 2017 and to 17 per cent for the financial year 2020), and may enable greater flexibility to use losses within a group.
However, it will also mean the application of the new interest barrier and loss restriction rules noted above to offshore landlords, resulting in a potential restriction to their deductible finance costs and ability to utilise tax losses.
There has been no suggestion, yet, that this extension of corporation tax will apply to capital gains of offshore property companies.
No date has been given for the implementation of this measure, and with the Government’s consultation only beginning at Budget 2017 it seems unlikely that this change will take effect before April 2018.
4.2 Offshore property developers’ taskforce
HMRC have established a taskforce targeting developments that used offshore structures where little or no UK corporation tax was paid on residential development profits (the Candy brothers’ Hyde Park development apparently being one such instance that is currently very publicly in the news).
Any challenge to an offshore structure is likely to be on the basis that the developer company had a “permanent establishment” in the UK, to which profits can be attributed and taxed accordingly. HMRC’s chances of success will depend to a large extent on how the tax structuring has been implemented in practice, and they will investigate how the development was carried out on the ground and the role of onshore development managers. In addition, HMRC have said that they will also scrutinise other tax aspects of the structuring including any VAT and SDLT planning.
With kind regards
Roy Saunders